As I commented on the blog post of a friend of mine, on my way from work this morning I prayed for Obama. I also prayed for American people, 52% of whom made grave mistake electing Mr. Obama to the office of the president of this country.

Politics are like swing of a pendulum on many levels. While Obama may have won the election, he had began loosing long before the ballots where cast.

As the president of this country, he will be changed to protect lives o millions of Americans across the globe. The problem is that Mr. Obama has no clue, or for the sake of his political career does not want to acknowledge the origin of life. I can’t trust anyone to protect my life when it is above his pay grade to know when my life began. I can’t trust anyone to protect my life who does not believe that my live is a great gift from God.

It has been reported that support for Obama was overwhelming among the minority groups. I believe firmly that if it was not for abortion, many minorities may in fact have become majorities. In New Jersey alone overwhelming majority of babies killed through abortion are black.

Obama’s opposition to “Born Alive Protection Act” is even more troubling. Born Alive Protection Act was designed to protect the lives of babies that were born during botched abortions. Not even one of the US senators opposed the legislation. Identical legislation was defeated in Illinois state senate by the opposition lead by then IL senator Barak Obama.

No matter how much our media will try to deify Obama, his election is not a divine act but a mistake of millions of Americans.

I prayed that God will overlook our mistakes and to give us courage to recognize the times we have done wrong.

Courtesy of Black Republican PAC.

“My lawyers were looking for a young, white woman to be a guinea pig for a great new social experiment, somewhat like Adolf Hitler did.I wanted an abortion at the time, but my lawyers did not tell me that I would be killing a human being. My lawyers did not tell me that I would later come to deeply regret that I was partially responsible for killing 40-50 million human beings,” – Norma McCorvey (aka Jane Roe)

Picture credit: Mongibeddu

The author of Accidental Russofile commenting on my blog has accused me of building a straw man. I can argue my position by pointing out that “pro-choice” stance is more about keeping abortion legal than offering a real choice. Many men and women are so misinformed about abortion and possible devastating aftermath that their decision to abort can be called anything but a free choice. But that misinformation is not limited to the abortion. It appears that such misinformation carries into many other areas as well. Stem cell research is one such area.

Just take a look at the following announcement of Massachusetts Biotechnology Council:

Some consider stem cell research the Holy Grail of regenerative medicine. Others view the idea as morally wrong. But what would you do if your child became paralyzed from the waist down and you had access to the research that might allow them to walk again one day? These questions our society continues to grapple with. Follow a respected neurologist into the unknown territory of stem cell research.

Talk about the straw man! I am wondering why the word embryonic is omitted? The above paragraph is presenting a lie from the very start. We, in pro-life movement, are not against the stem cell research. In fact we welcome and support the research in the area as along as the cells are not taken from embryos- effectively destroying embryos in the process. We indeed encourage such a research. The other lie in that short paragraph is hidden behind suffering of an innocent people who may be suffering from presently incurable diseases. As if by opposing destroying embryos we indeed depriving these poor people from hope that one day a cure will be found. The fallacy here lies in the fact that so far no evidence has been presented that cells derived from the embryos have actually contribute to curing a disease. In fact there are better hopes that adult stem cell research can be more beneficial. One of the “fathers” of Dolly the Sheep has abandoned the experimenting with human embryos:

Prof Wilmut announced that he was abandoning the cloning of human embryos in stem cell research in favour of a new technique developed in Japan

Wilmut’s announcement come as a definite blow to those who favor embryonic stem cell research. Hopefully the American “scientists” begin to catch up as well and turning their efforts and research into the area free of moral and ethical problems. Otherwise they have no choice but to stick to their “straw men”.

There is one big inconsistency in the pro-abortion camp. Today I was doing a little research on the presidential candidates. I am sure every concerned citizen of this country is doing the same. How can you not?!! After Iowa behind us and New Hampshire is just days away, we need to be concerned or at least interested who will lead this country in about 12 months. As some one that is concerned about candidates stance on abortion, I am defying the majority of Facebook- they want to hear more about economy. I on the other hand wanted to hear more about candidates stance on abortion. While I ma very familiar with republican candidates position on the issue, admittedly I did not know much about their rivals stance on abortion. So I decided to spend a little more time to study them. I am neither shocked nor am I surprised by what was I able to learn. I did however found one interesting similarity. No matter how strong was pro-abortion stance of any of the democratic candidates, every single one of them, one time or another, acknowledged that things should be done to reduce abortions.

My question is why? The pro-abortion activists shout on the top of their lungs that right to abortion empowers women. Should not we strive to increase the number abortion since they are so empowering? Where is the consistency???

If you want successful business you need to keep your clients coming back. You can do so by providing an exceptional services or lure them in by lies and deceit. Guess which one applies to Planned Parenthood?

Before argue about the lies and deceit let see how “successful” the abortion industry is. It i approximated that 1.3 million abortions take place in the US each year. According to Guttmacher Institute in 2001, on average, for an abortion before 10th week of gestation “doctors” charged about $372. Any one who can do the math can see how Planned Parenthood is all about making money. Don’t tell me that an industry that takes in $483,600,000.00 a year is not interested in keep their “customers” coming back.

A former abortion provider Joan Appleton has an interesting “inside” prospective on how it is done:

I would be able to counsel a woman and say, “Alright, we don’t want you to have to go through this procedure again. We want to get you started on birth control pills. We’ll give you your first packet free.” We could do this because the pharmaceutical companies gave it to us free. It’s good marketing. So we could distribute one pack free and write a prescription for five months worth. Everybody makes out.

If the birth control pill doesn’t work for you this time, it may be that it’s a little too strong. But don’t worry, come on back because there’s one that’s a little lower dose.

Now the pharmaceutical companies and Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry were not stupid. They knew that the less dose of estrogen in those pills, the more likely it was they were going to fail. But you don’t have to worry. We can bring you right back here for another abortion.

They even used percentages, by the way. Thirty percent failure rate, because were going to use the real low estrogen pill. So that means thirty percent will come back. And if we forget to tell you, by the way, that if you get the flu and have to be put on antibiotics, the chemical reaction between the birth control pill and the antibiotic renders the birth control pill worthless, and totally ineffective, so we have another twenty percent. Thank you, come back around.

Every year the abortion industry becomes reacher by half a billion dollars while our society becomes poorer by 1.3 beautiful babies like this one:

Tags: abortion business, contraception, Planned Parenthood

After viewing Juno, I have been keeping an eye on how the pro-abortion pundits will react to it. A review on Entertainment Weekly by Liza Schwarzbaum was one of the first to caught my eye. Surpassingly Ms. Schwarzbaum tone of review was not as harsh. Besides expressing regret over the fact that movie failed to point out that abortion is a “precious right” that “should be cherished” she called the movie a “delightful and good-hearted a portrait of the kind of new-generation”.

I have to admit that I enjoy seeing the pro-abortion side preoccupied over the movie. But I really wanted to see at least some of them go into a tailspin over it. My patience was rewarded. Arthur Shostak, a pro-aortion activist and a writer for RH Reality Check website, goes straight to the point in his review of Juno:

in its underlying condemnation of abortion on request, the film is a far more costly blow against abortion rights than anything the anti-abortion crowd could possibly hope for or ever produce – and they are big gainers (at no cost to them) from its sappy popularity

No other reviewer had nailed it so precisely as Mr. Shostak did. We on the pro-life side do benefit from it at no cost at all, which makes Mr. Shostak mad.

I think he and his pro-abortion friends would be thrilled if the movie was at least accompanied by the most recent despicable commercial from the largest death camp chain- Planned Parenthood:

By the way, did you know Planned Parenthood is using your tax money to produce these commercials?